curiously bad album art: pt.II

E-mail this post

Remember me (?)

All personal information that you provide here will be governed by the Privacy Policy of More...

Q. Who thought it was a good idea to assemble 9 former addicts to sing? We all know drugs are prolific in the music biz. Once the touring starts... these poor suckers don't stand a chance.
Q. Why are they all bodiless? Are they ghosts? Are they "former" meaning "dead"?
Q. Why would an album extolling sobriety look so much like a bad acid trip? (clearly the designer has a wee substance problem himself).

0 Responses to “curiously bad album art: pt.II”

Leave a Reply

      Convert to boldConvert to italicConvert to link


previously on i heart to blog

i heart archives

i heart site picks

i heart books on the go

i heart learning css
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from A•pril. Make your own badge here.

Stumble Upon Toolbar

a t o m . 0 . 3

Add to Technorati Favorites